Uber is trying to leverage its logistics expertise in areas outside of hailing taxis. Between eating, hauling, and deliveries, it’s trying to apply the same algorithms and systems across a wide assortment of services even as it continues to expand its core taxi business into more cities.
It may be a predictable move, but with every step they elbow their way into more competition, from startups like Doordash to public tech companies like Amazon to incumbent firms like FedEx. If they’re successful, it would prove that there is true value in building a largely content-agnostic, courier and driver efficient transportation network. Any deficiencies can be squelched with sufficient scale.
The counter argument is that verticals matter, and that optimizing for a specific function – food, groceries, moving, taxis – provides a better user experience. The problem is that not all these areas are viable businesses; even if Uber’s restaurant delivery service is objectively worse than a custom framework for food delivery, the logistical and legal and marketing challenges have to be addressed by each startup separately.
But if they’re able to create something sustainable, then that may render Uber’s proprietary algorithms and logistics a mere commodity.

Another month, another great photos service. Google Photos is the latest service to one-up its competition, and there’s a lot to like about it: both the effectively unlimited storage{{1}} and the machine-intelligent search play to Google’s core strengths and are …

A couple years back, in the midst of the revival of PC hardware—new construction materials, screens, touch interfaces, etc.—, there were a handful of bearish takes which noted that the industry was on its last gasps, that in the lifecycle …